|
For Immediate Release
July 24, 2003
For more information contact patti@naiatrust.org
Hunt ban gains momentum
in Parliament
In
an ironic reversal of history, the
British Parliament appears ready to
surrender its birthright as the architect
of modern democracy and defender of
human rights. Once champions of liberty,
English lawmakers are now poised to
quash the traditions of the British
rural minority at the behest of its
urban majority. The clash is over
cultural values, not national security,
national defense, public safety, or
public health.
The
battle lines are drawn over the right
to hunt foxes and other quarry with
hounds, a pastime that brings economic,
social, and cultural benefits to rural
areas and helps remove livestock predators.
If the hunts are banned as demanded
by animal rights activists and the
House of Commons, thousands of hounds
will be euthanized, hunt clubs and
stables will close, farriers and veterinarians
will lose business, farmers will be
robbed of a quick-kill method of dispatching
foxes that raid their flocks, and
rural conservation efforts may be
stalled. Kept in check for more than
100 years, foxes may become more of
a nuisance in suburban areas and more
of a threat to pets and wild prey.
The ban
On June 30, the House of Commons voted
to ban all hunting with hounds in
England and Wales in spite of a compromise
bill offered by the British Government.
The House then affirmed that vote
on July 9, sending the ban bill to
the House of Lords. The Lords will
consider the bill as early as September.The
House of Lords has consistently taken
a pro-hunting view. However, if they
vote against the ban, the House of
Commons may invoke a little-known
and rarely-used provision that allows
them to override the Lords decision.
If the ban becomes law, promoters
will turn their efforts to other forms
of hunting in Britain and will be
emboldened to do the same in the US.The
Countryside
Alliance has asked for the help
of sportsmen all over the world to
support the hundreds of thousands
of British citizens who will be affected
by this ban. They make the following
points and ask for letters to the
British civil servants listed below.
·
A ban represents an attack on an entire
culture, rural economies and way of
life with no scientific basis to support
a ban.
·
Hunting with hounds is a lawful, traditional,
leisure pursuit practiced for hundreds
of years; it contributes millions
to the economy and affirms peoples
connection to land and should not
be criminalized in a campaign motivated
by prejudice and sustained by misinformation.
·
Hunting is the most humane and natural
method of management; more than 500
vets say a ban would be detrimental
to animal welfare.
·
Animal rights groups have capitalized
on the urban public's ignorance of
nature, wildlife and domestic animals.
Their outlandish claims have been
proven to be false. They capitalize
on the public's emotional response
to issues they don't understand. The
definition of cruelty is relative
depending on one's environment, upbringing,
education, and economic status.
·
More foxes have died painfully
slow deaths since hunting with hounds
was banned in Scotland. Hounds kill
foxes in seconds; none are injured
and get away.
·
More pressing problems face British
rural communities such as limited
provision of public transport, schools,
policing, health facilities and the
state of the rural economy.
·
A recently published study conducted
by the University of Kent has shown
that hunting makes an important contribution
to the UK's rural habitats and species
conservation.
·
Organizations such as the League Against
Cruel Sports and the Royal Society
for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
have all expressed their opposition
to fishing and/or shooting. Most have
stated that their campaign to ban
these sports would begin should hunting
be banned. They won't stop with banning
hunting with hounds. All hunting,
fishing and sports involving animals
are targeted. The acknowledged philosophical
bottom line for many animal rights
groups is to achieve a petless/meatless
society.
·
Following the EU's ban of burying
fallen stock on farms, 78 percent
of disposal methods in the UK are
provided by hunt kennels. If hunting
is banned, the number of legal disposal
outlets will be severely reduced.
·
The issue is more than hunting, it
is the preservation of the democratic
process.
Send
letters to:
The
Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, M.P., Foreign
Secretary, King Charles Street, London,
SW1A 2AH;British
Embassy in Washington:
Sir
David Manning, KCMG, 3100 Massachusetts
Avenue NW, Washington DC 20008
Lord
Renwick, House of Lords, London SW1A
0PW (ex Ambassador in Washington;
Labour peer)
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Contents
of NAIA Trust Action Alerts are copyright
2003 by the NAIA Trust. Permission to
repost in its entirety is granted as
long as all content remains intact.
|